We provided an E0181 (alternating pressure pad w/ pump) to a client who already received an E0185 (gel pad overlay) within the past 5 years. The ABN said it would likely be denied for similar equipment. The patient sent it for review, we forgot to include the GA mod on the claim, their review was denied but said pt responsibility was $0. So we sent a redetermination request w/ copy of ABN (signed by patient) asking that they add the GA mod to the claim and show patient responsibility 100%. They denied our request stating that because we didn't supply any medical records that it didn't show the patient met coverage criteria - not an issue of similar equipment - therefore we were responsible. My original denial had the M3 (similar equp) code. This is all so ridiculous. Makes me furious. Why would I get medical records for a lesser item when I know it will be denied for similar equipment? If the POA papers are good in a court of law it should be good enuf for Medicare. It isn't just some random person signing for them...
__________________
Heather
|